Audio Comparer V1.7
CLICK HERE === https://urllie.com/2tas9A
To assess the similarity of the suppression of the visual response to AaVa and Va, we reasoned that if experience with the reward-paired auditory-visual stimulus (AaVa) decreased the responsiveness of V1 to a visual stimulus paired with it (Va), then the suppression of the visual response to AaVa would be similar to that of Va. Indeed, we found that both the auditory cue and the audio-visual pair resulted in suppression of the visual response to Va at similar levels (Fig. 2a). Thus, experience with pairings can reduce the responsiveness of V1 to a visual stimulus in a similar manner for both reinforced and non-reinforced pairings. Interestingly, the visual response to Vc did not decrease with conditioning (Extended Data Fig. 1b), suggesting that the response to a visual stimulus in the absence of auditory reinforcement may not become suppressed by training. We next asked whether the suppression of the visual response to AaVa was specific to reward-paired visual stimuli or a general phenomenon. To address this question, we compared the suppression of the visual response to AaVa to that of a non-reinforced auditory-visual stimulus, Aa (Extended Data Fig. 2b). We found that both the auditory and visual responses were suppressed by the non-reinforced stimulus. This similarity in suppression between AaVa and Aa indicates that experience with audio-visual stimuli paired with reward has a specific suppressive effect on V1, but is not specific to the reward-paired stimuli. Finally, we examined whether learning is specific to audio-visual pairings or generalizes to other sensory modalities. We trained mice on simultaneous visual and auditory training where the sound was paired with the visual stimulus on some trials and not paired with it on other trials (Fig. 2b). Upon testing, the auditory-visual and visual-auditory responses to Vc were similar (Fig. 2c). We then compared the responses to AaVa to those of non-paired visual stimuli (Va) and found that, similar to the primary trained stimuli, responses to AaVa were suppressed (Fig. 2d). To address whether suppression of responses was specific to audio-visual pairings, we trained mice on visual stimuli paired with a reward (Extended Data Fig. 3a).
As for the Wyze V2 audio quality, I've tested the audio by way of audio recorder and the Wyze Cam has a very good audio quality. Yes it is by no means top of the line, but it's perfectly adequate for basic recording / streaming purposes. If you're only capturing a single person speaking, which is the main use of a webcam, then this cam is perfect.
As for the Wyze V3, I agree with you, it seems a bit of a downer in terms of audio quality. You may want to look into the audio quality of the Wyze V3 as it is the first Wyze cam to be IP-65 rated. I recommend you get a few friends over and ask them for their thoughts on the audio quality. If they find it good, then maybe you should place an order for one.
On the whole, I have been very pleased with the quality of the Wyze Cam cams I've tried. I do not have, nor have I ever heard of, anyone having issues with the audio quality of the Wyze Cams. What I have come across, however, is the issue of the bright white light that sometimes comes from the camera. This depends on the ambient light level, but typically it is not a problem because the camera has a capability to dim the white light to a color that can be adjusted by the user. However, if you do have issues with the white light, perhaps someone else on here may know the solution to that problem. 827ec27edc